VantageScore Credit Scoring System a Bunch of Malarkey

Did you hear the good news? It was announced last week that Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion have teamed up to develop a new credit scoring system. Scores using the new system, dubbed VantageScore, will be available for purchase from the three major credit bureaus within a few months. Unlike FICO's scores that range from 300-900, VantageScore scores will range from 501-990 and can be compared to a typical academic grading system: 901-990 = A; 801-900 = B; 701-800 = C; 601-700 = D; and 501-600 = F. But do we really need a new credit scoring system?

One of the advantages being touted by the new system is scoring consistency across credit bureaus. Currently, your credit score will usually vary from one credit bureau to the next. A common algorithm should make the scores consistent across the board, right? Well, not exactly. Just because all three bureaus will be using an identical scoring algorithm does not mean that the results will be the same. There will still be discrepancies between scores from different credit bureaus because the data that is plugged into the algoritm differs from one credit bureau to the next. Some creditors report to one bureau. Others will report to two or all three. So a consumer will have a different credit report, and therefore a different score, from each of the three bureaus. This will still continue, even under the new VantageScore model.

What's more is that the vast majority of lenders have been using Fair Isaac's FICO credit scoring model for decades. A switch to the new VantageScore model is unfeasible and unlikely. Perhaps the 501-990 model put into the context of a typical academic grading system is a bit simpler to understand, but in fact, it's all quite arbitrary. For lack of a better comparison, I find this somewhat analogous to the United States government attempt at metrication by replacing the standard measurement system of feet, miles, gallons, etc. with the decimal-based metric system.

Bottom line: Admittedly, this is a great PR stunt by the credit bureaus to get us consumers to buy their new scores, but in truth, it doesn't seem like it's worth all the fuss. Just because the scoring system is changing doesn't change your credit history. Bad credit is still bad credit; good credit is still good credit; and one foot still equals 0.3048 meters.

Comments

TEHelms said:

I work for a major lender. All consumers should write their congressmen to demand the three bureaus be more responsive to errors in the system put there by creditors.

As it now stands, when a consumer tries to correct info entered into a bureau, it is virtually impossible to speak with a live person or get them to change what a creditor has put into their system that is a mistake because the bureau goes back to that creditor to verify the information.

Also, a bureau can block the name of the creditor so the consumer cannot even read who has filed a collection or have access to a phone number to know who to contact!

Additionally, a creditor can change the loan numbers, the amount and this makes it all but impossible for a consumer to track and make sure what has been paid is not a duplicate of what they already settled!

A creditor can also sell an account for collection to any number of collection agencies and a consumer can be charged for the same debt a number of times.

Consumer friendly? I think not!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

« Is Fujitsu Software to Blame for Debit Card Data Theft? | Credit Card Blog Home | Top Five Credit Card Scams #1: Secured Credit Card Marketing »